Monthly Archives: April 2013

“Police State” Registry System Being Set Up to Track Your Vaccination Status

eye-on-you-300x199

The Centers for Disease Control has been quietly rolling out a nationwide program called the Immunization Information Systems (IIS), registering your vaccine information into a database. [1] This effort has been run in parallel with state vaccine registry implementations.

What is the intention of such programs?

My colleague Leslie Manookian, writer and director of the movie The Greater Good, wrote in a recent article, the “CDC has openly stated that vaccine registries are a tool to identify areas of ‘undervaccination’ so that they can be ‘addressed’ and brought into ‘compliance.’” [2]

I would also add to Leslie’s statement that since the government purchases a large bulk of the vaccines (for example, the Vaccines for Children program), it is in their financial interest to make sure vaccines are consumed regularly.

If you exempt your child from being vaccinated, your refusal is also being tracked and put into the database. If you want to know why this is a big deal, read on.

But first, what does tracking every vaccine you or your children have ever been injected with look like?

Big Plans for You

I want to make this very real for you.

The government collects information on who vaccinates their children and who does not. They know how many children have had their vaccines. They also know how many children have opted out of being vaccinated. They have the data.

The government has big plans and the most outrageous part about this entire scheme is you don’t have a choice – your data is entered. In order to accomplish this task we have to answer 3 basic questions.

1. What data is being tracked?

2. Who has access to the tracked data?

3. What will be done with this data?

Let’s start with the first question of what is being tracked.

 

Question #1: What Data is Being Tracked?

You’ll be surprised at how much data is being tracked. Some of the data is required while other data sets are optional. Rest assured, what is optional today can become required in short order.

According to the Immunization Information System Functional Standards, 2013 – 2017, the following information will be in their databases: [3]

  • REQUIRED: Patient name: first, middle, last
  • Optional: Patient alias name: first, middle, last
  • Optional: Patient address, phone number
  • Optional: Birthing facility
  • Optional: Patient Social Security number (SSN)
  • REQUIRED: Patient birth date
  • REQUIRED: Patient sex
  • REQUIRED: Patient race
  • REQUIRED: Patient ethnicity
  • Optional: Patient Primary language
  • REQUIRED: Patient birth order
  • Optional: Patient birth registration number
  • REQUIRED: Patient birth State/country
  • Optional: Patient Medicaid number Optional
  • REQUIRED: Mother’s name: First, middle, last, maiden
  • Optional: Mother’s SSN
  • Optional: Father’s name: first, middle, last
  • Optional: Father’s SSN
  • REQUIRED: Vaccine Type
  • REQUIRED: Vaccine Manufacturer
  • Optional: Vaccine dose number
  • Optional: Vaccine expiration date
  • Optional: Vaccine injection site
  • REQUIRED: Vaccination date
  • REQUIRED: Vaccine lot number
  • Optional: Vaccine provider

Do you trust anyone with your personal information? This leads us to the next question …

 

Question #2: Who Has Access to the Tracked Data?

This is where the language should have you a little concerned because it is extremely vague.

According to the Immunization Information System documentation, data can be provided to “healthcare providers, public health, and other authorized stakeholders.”

It goes on to say schools, child care, and child camps may also have access to the records.

One of the major areas the lawmakers neglected to mention was the power granted to your employer. Consider the fact this past year nurses were actually being fired for not having their flu shot, as reported by Natural News. [4] Imagine if the proper pressure were applied to businesses to meet a government mandate. They would be given access to these records. It’s something for you to chew on.

That brings us to our last question…

A snapshot from the Centers for Disease Control Immunization Information Systems data flow.

Question #3: What Will Be Done with This Data?

The Centers for Disease Control’s goal is to get 95% or greater vaccine compliance. How is this accomplished?

In the short term, if your child is not vaccinated or is behind schedule, expect phone calls, emails, and personal visits from local health authorities. One function of the CDC’s Immunization Information System is to “forecast” vaccines due, past due, or coming due.

When these tactics don’t work or are ignored, expect more a more confrontational strategy. Keep in mind what happened on Christmas Eve 2009.

The U.S. Senate passed H.R. 3590. The bill eventually became Public Law No. 111-148, which gives the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) authorization to create “vaccination squads” in local communities and seek out unvaccinated children. The “vaccine squads” are called the Community Preventive Services Task Force. [5]

Not only will the Task Force be working with the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, but on page 1202 of that law, the most relevant responsibilities are listed as:

“(D) carrying out immunization-promoting strategies for participants or clients of public programs, including assessments of immunization status, referrals to health care providers, education, provision [provide] of on-site immunizations, or incentives for immunization;

“(E) providing for home visits that promote immunization through education, assessments of need, referrals, provision of immunizations, or other services;”

“(F) providing reminders or recalls for immunization providers;”

“(G) conducting assessments of, and providing feedback to, immunization providers;”

“(H) any combination of one or more interventions described in this paragraph; or”

“(I) immunization information systems to allow all States to have electronic databases for immunization records.”

Conclusion

The Public Law exclusively states exactly where the data will come from – the Immunization Information Systems. Can you imagine police or sheriffs escorting the vaccine squad(s) for “non-compliant” parents?

At this point, I really can’t put it past them.

Consequently, once this system is completely operational, the sky is the limit. Big Brother has the capability to track more than just vaccines. You can anticipate finding just about any pharmaceutical drug mandated by the government in this same system.

The question then becomes, who influences the government agencies mandating vaccines?

“Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” – Lord Acton

References

 

1. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/about.html
2. http://www.greatergoodmovie.org/news-views/vaccine-registries-whats-all-the-fuss/
3. http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/func-stds.pdf
4. http://www.naturalnews.com/037544_healthcare_workers_flu_shots_colorado.html
5. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf

Teaching Seminar, Mallorca, End of 2013

hero3-e3ec413d-c2fc-4fa6-90dd-546ad6751ef2UPDATE: The June dates are now not available for further participants. Sorry to disappoint.

***************

We are looking at a final 2013 date for September October or November depending on numbers and requirements. The minimum attendees for the end of the year is 8 and maximum is 50. As soon as we know the approx numbers we can book the appropriate venue for the Seminar.

Many people visiting the island, book a week or two weeks holiday with their family and then attend the function and still have time for relaxation and a rest after.

**************

The language the seminar will be conducted in will be English. We will be presenting many case examples and presentations to show Hahnemanns methodology.

**************

After several private training sessions with solo practitioners, We have decided to offer a group training in the Hahnemannian/Boenninghausen methodology, which is the most successful application of the therapy in the world.

P & W have researched the works of Boenninghausen and Hahnemann for over 11 years, and have produced a computerised repertory in 4 languages based on the original 1846 German edition, which has been meticulously corrected and completely retranslated in the English, Spanish and Hebrew languages. The work, which took 4 years to complete, uses the original layout of Boenninghausen, and therefor is familiar to students who use Allens version. Each rubric has been carefully checked for language meaning in the 18th/19th century, and amended carefully to represent the original intent of the author for description of a disease or eruption or location.

Modern students of homoeopathy have not been exposed to the accuracy of this repertory. Once the key symptoms are noted, the choices of medicines are indicated with absolute certainty, and a brief read of the Materia Medica will determine the final choice for prescription.

The repertory is easy to use. The methodology takes a little practice.  We have honed a practitioner training course to 3 days, from which the basics and methodology will be fully inculcated in the receptive physician.

The teaching will include the following points among many others:

  • What we are looking for in disease.(According to Hahnemann)
  • What symptoms are important.
  • How to isolate key symptoms.
  • How to find the pivotal symptoms in totality.
  • What totality means.
  • How to track the disease/medicinal progress and when to change medicine.
  • How to evaluate progress
  • When to repeat a dose
  • When to wait on a dose, and why.
  • When to finish treatment
  • How to use the repertory with confidence.
  • How to reduce consultation times by getting the necessary prescribing information quickly, and eliminating the spurious questions.
  • How to use the Materia Medica.

A 3 day Seminar is being planned for the latter end of the year (2013) to be held in Mallorca. The location was chosen for ease of access for European attendees, and relative inexpensiveness of accommodation.

The Seminar cost, depending on numbers, will include Water, Tea and Coffee.

All meals, travel costs, accommodation etc, is the responsibility of the student. We estimate that Seminar costs for 3 days will be in the region of €450-€500 depending on numbers. Depending on numbers, we will try and keep the Seminar in the Palma region for ease of getting to.

Example costs to the Island. A week in Mallorca in October can be as low as €250 including flights

If you are interested in the Seminar, Please drop an email to seminars@garyweaver.org

More details will follow in due course.

The entire vaccine program is based on a massive Fraud.

Post Vaccination – Vaccine Targeted Strain – Viral and Bacterial Pathogen – Shedding

So how much of this said claim is truth and real, and/or not real? Do we know? A search for the evidence.

First of all, let me ask this. Why is it, that when the conclusions of actually peer reviewed studies are not in your favor as to the intended agenda bias, that even endless peer reviewed studies are not enough to get pro-vaccine people to take a look at and even read a single one of those studies; yet when there are limited to little to no existing peer reviewed studies, that they are jumping all over with demands to produce a peer reviewed study, to make such as any certain such as a vax-truth opposing persons point of contention, that has expressed?

In regard to vaccines lets go to the issue of vaccine shedding, and ask the question as to can and do any of the current vaccines shed the pathogen in a way that could make a non vaccinated person susceptible to acquiring the illness from a vaccinated person. There are in Pubmed several but limited studies that address the shedding issue as to in regard to the various vaccines. Just use the search terms vaccine shedding Pubmed, and will you several but as said limited numbers references in the google listing, and then you can go to pubmed itself, which is somewhat as well limited for available references as to claiming one way or the other. As for the measles vaccine, one Pubmed reference stated that it the vaccine could shed for up to three days. Certainly long enough to infect another individual.

So, actually and possibly no one really nor likely knows for sure what the complete truth is on this issue. It would seem to be common sense that the vaccine makers surely do not and would not want to know if their vaccine causes shedding or not; nor to find out. So then who would actually fund theses said studies. I think with what I read and reviewed in regard to vaccine shedding, just getting into even the beginning phase of the studies, tells me that vaccines do have a potential to shed irregardless of being bacterial or viral; which very well could be an obvious risk to the unvaccinated. I mean good grief, the existing studies clearly point to the push to vaccinate everyone due to the risk of shedding possibility. What more evidence would you need of the risk of the vaccinated, to the unvaccinated? And yet the pro-vaccine side wants to claim to just the opposite; and that it is only the vaccinated that are at risk from the unvaccinated??? You know accused again of reducing the vaccine derived herd immunity; even though the schools most often even today have no more than a 5% or less rate of existing school exemptions?  We as well by the way are not are NOT just talking about the oral polio vaccine, here. They clearly know that the oral polio vaccine sheds and can as well cause numerous cases of AFP in the underdeveloped and unsanitary for conditions countries, that the oral polio vaccine is still used to day. They know of the identified mutations in the polio vaccine virus that the the said oral vaccine has very likely as well caused. if they have an alternative explanation, I have yet to hear and or read about it.

So, let me ask you, have vaccines eradicated so called illness and disease, or have they just prolonged the exit, while creating only lower levels of chronic disease, and disease conditions? How about other unrelated chronic illness and autoimmune disease, unrelated to the vaccine targeted pathogen? How about the pubmed listed as well references to the harm of aluminum adjuvants, causing overactivation of the brains microglia and resulting low levels of chronic brain inflammation resulting for repeat multiple vaccines, in some individuals; maybe more individuals and children that we have ever realized? How about the aluminum adjuvant connection to ASD? The studies, and new studies have shown that same brain inflammation to now be found in more and more children and individuals with ASD. And they want to tell us that vaccines have never been scientifically linked in any study, to ASD? Really? How about the MMR vaccine, in which there are actually some similar physiological pathways found in relation to ASD, and also which are in common with heavy metal toxicity, if not overload, in regard to both thimerosal, and aluminum adjuvants. I don’t know about you and what you think, but I think it is not looking good for the claim as to the issue of vaccines doing more good than harm. When will the CD stop living in the dark ages, and dragging their feet as to doing the proper studies? Yet they waste millions chasing the genetic link to ASD, and refuse all other types and forms of real research?

I did pick one specific peer reviewed reference in regard shedding, that I thought was interesting, and a bit troublesome regarding risk. In regard to the shedding of course all they can come up with is to come up with that every last person existing must be vaccinated to protect them against the shedding.

Pertussis infection in fully vaccinated children in day-care centers, Israel.

Abstract

We tested 46 fully vaccinated children in two day-care centers in Israel who were exposed to a fatal case of pertussis infection. Only two of five children who tested positive for Bordetella pertussis met the World Health Organization’s case definition for pertussis. Vaccinated children may be asymptomatic reservoirs for infection.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627963/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627963/pdf/10998384.pdf

Pertussis Vaccine Failure is not Just Modern but Historical: Vaccine has Never Been Effective
http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/pertussis-vaccine-failure-is-not-just-modern-but-historical-vaccine-has-never-been-effective/

Researchers find first US evidence of vaccine-resistant pertussis
http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/researchers-find-first-us-evidence-of-vaccine-resistant-pertussis/

And they tell us the vaccines do not shed? How would this be possible if the vaccines do not shed anything contagious? And they want us to believe that the un-vaccinated are a risk to the vaccinated. Vaccine derived herd relatively and comparatively short term immunity, has never had any actual science behind it; and as to natural long term and/or life time immunity, where as that concept actually makes does sense. So what is the REAL reason they say they need vaccine derived herd immunity? Is it possible that it is more likely due to the issue of vaccine shedding? Now we are getting to some actual understanding of what possibly really goes on.

17 Examples of Admitted Vaccine Failure
http://vactruth.com/2013/02/23/17-examples-of-vaccine-failure/

Article

ECZEMA VACCINATUM

ABSTRACT

Nine cases of eczema vaccinatum are presented, including two fatalities. Seven were caused by contact of a child with eczema with a recently vaccinated sibling.

Suddenly appearing umbilicated vesicles superimposed upon atopic eczema are almost diagnostic of eczema vaccinatum or eczema herpeticum. These do not occur with mere secondary bacterial infection.

Hyperimmune vaccinal gamma-globulin is now available for specific therapy.

Eczema vaccinatum is frequently iatrogenic and uniformly preventable.

The following steps are recommended for prophylaxis: 1) No child with atopic eczema or other skin disorder should be vaccinated. 2) No child should be vaccinated if any member of his family has eczema or other skin disorder. 3) Parents of children with eczema should be notified at the onset of the disease of the danger from vaccination contact. 4) If a sibling of a child with atopic eczema is vaccinated, he must be completely separated from that child for at least 21 days. 5) Forms used by state and local health departments for parents’ consent to vaccination should include an appropriate warning of the contraindications. 6) Eczema vaccinatum should be a reportable disease. 7) Patients recently vaccinated must be excluded from pediatric wards containing patients with atopic eczema, other diseases of the skin, burns or healing surgical incisions. 8) Vaccination may be recommended at 2 months of age, especially for babies from strongly allergic families.

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/22/2/259

Acellular pertussis vaccination enhances B. parapertussis colonization

An acellular whooping cough vaccine actually enhances the colonization of Bordetella parapertussis in mice; pointing towards a rise in B. parapertussis incidence resulting from acellular vaccination, which may have contributed to the observed increase in whooping cough over the last decade.

http://www.cidd.psu.edu/research/synopses/acellular-vaccine-enhancement-b.-parapertussi

And rarely are they testing for it nor even knowing understanding what pertussis pathogen strains are there. B parapertussis antigen is not in the current vaccine. And the fear mongering and the recommended boosters continue.

They can admit to the pertussis vaccine failure in Pakistan, but the CDC can not and refuses to admit to that here happening in the US.

Public Health. 2012 Jun;126(6):518-22. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 23.

Pertussis resurgence among vaccinated children in Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan.

Mughal A, Kazi YF, Bukhari HA, Ali M.

Source:Diagnostic and Research Centre, Department of Microbiology, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Sindh, Pakistan.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the aetiology of persistent cough among vaccinated children as suspected cases of pertussis in Khairpur District, Sindh, Pakistan. Pertussis or whooping cough, caused by Bordetella pertussis, is re-appearing in many countries despite vaccination coverage. In Khairpur, persistent cough and symptoms similar to pertussis among vaccinated children are common but the aetiology has not been investigated previously.

STUDY DESIGN:

B. pertussis was isolated from cough samples of suspected pertussis patients (n = 700) using the cough plate method with charcoal agar.

METHODS:

Isolation and confirmation of the clinical isolates of B. pertussis was performed by culture on Bordet-Gengou medium, biochemical tests and polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS:

In total, 22 strains of B. pertussis were isolated from clinical cough samples.

CONCLUSION:

To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report of the presence of pertussis in vaccinated children in Khairpur. There is a need for continuous monitoring of pertussis after immunization programmes in order to assess the efficacy of pertussis vaccination.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22445714

And what has the CDC done about it all? They have only continued with their fear mongering and falsely blaming the un-vaccinated. Cocoon tyle vaccinating whole families, and still the outbreaks occur.

The False Theory of Vaccine Derived – Herd Immunity 
http://www.vacfacts.info/the-false-theory-of-vaccine-derived—herd-immunity.html

———————-

Whooping Cough Epidemic Caused by Virulent New Pertussis Strain—And It’s the Result of Vaccine
http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2012-10-31/whooping-cough-epidemic-caused-by-virulent-new-pertussis-strain-and-its-the-result-of-vaccine/

Bordetella pertussis Strains with Increased Toxin Production Associated with Pertussis Resurgence (PDF)

Abstract excerpt:

We present evidence that in the Netherlands the dramatic increase in pertussis is temporally associated with the emergence of Bordetella pertussis strains carrying a novel allele for the pertussis toxin promoter, which confers

increased pertussis toxin (Ptx) production. Epidemiologic data suggest that these strains are more virulent in humans. We discuss changes in the ecology of B. pertussis that may have driven this adaptation. Our results underline the importance of Ptx in transmission, suggest that vaccination may select for increased virulence, and indicate ways to control

http://gaia-health.com/articles451/000485-bpertussis.pdf

J Hyg (Lond). 1976 August; 77(1): 85–91.

PMCID: PMC2129724

Prevalent serotypes of Bordetella pertussis in non-vaccinated communities.

Abstract

In many countries, the prevalent serotypes of Bordetella pertussis have changed from a mixture of types 1,2,3 and 1,2 (organisms possessing antigen 2) to a predominance of type 1,3. The timing of the change in different countries is shown to be related to the introduction of mass-vaccination with material rich in antigens 1 and 2 but weak in, or devoid of, antigen 3. In several parts of the world, there have been outbreaks of type 1,3 infection in fully vaccinated children. Non-vaccinated communities in various parts of the world still show the pattern of serotypes which existed elsewhere before mass-vaccination. In order to avoid the disappointments experienced in the past, it is essential that pertussis vaccine for use in previously non-vaccinated communities, like that for any other country, should be rich in each of the three antigens.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2129724/

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Small Mutations in Bordetella pertussis Are Associated with Selective Sweeps

Abstract excerpt:

Our results suggest that the B. pertussis gene repertoire is already well adapted to its current niche and required only fine tuning to persist in the face of vaccination. Further, this work shows that small mutations, even single SNPs, can drive large changes in the populations of bacterial pathogens within a time span of six to 19 years.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0046407

You can not patent vitamin C, as you can an expensive drug or vaccine. Modern medicine is NOT about the actual health of your child, unless it can be done with chemical pharma.

Special Report: The Vitamin C Treatment of Whooping Cough (Pertussis)

http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/12/20/special-report-the-vitamin-c-treatment-of-whooping-cough-suzanne-humphries-md/

Here is what they already knew years ago in the treatment of pertussis.

Can Med Assoc J. 1937 August; 37(2): 134–136.
PMCID: PMC1562195
Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) Treatment of Whooping Cough *

Discussion
The short series of cases presented is too small to draw any statistical conclusions, but one fact stands out. Ascorbic acid has a definite efTect in shortening the period of paroxysms from a matter of weeks to a matter of days. We have not checked by cough plates or otherwise in this preliminary work to see whether the infectivity subsides simultaneously with the spasmodic symptoms, but are continuing with a larger series of cases in which these and other tests will be employed.

The dosages used have been empirical, with a tendency to use larger doses early in the disease as our experience of its effects progressed. The acid is available at reasonable prices, and the danger of overdosage seems negligible. Animals have received 2,000 times their estimated requirements without any deleterious effects. Any excess is excreted by the kidneys.

CONCLUSIONS
1. A method has been described for the treatment of whooping cough by ascorbic acid
(vitamin C).
2. Ascorbic acid definitely shortens the paroxysmal stage of the disease, particularly if
relatively

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1562195/?page=3

Pertussis is a bacteria, but either way it is beneficial.

Vitamin C As An Antiviral: It’s All About Dose
http://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v05n09.shtml

Vitamin C for Whooping Cough. Updated Edition. Suzanne Humphries, MD
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/09/07/vitamin-c-for-whooping-cough-updated-edition-suzanne-humphries-md/

Why is nobody studying vitamin C in whooping cough? – Conventional medicine’s hypocrisy. by Suzanne Humphries, MD
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/08/03/why-is-nobody-studying-vitamin-c-in-whooping-cough-by-suzanne-humphries-md/

LIPOSOMAL ENCAPSULATED VITAMIN C
http://www.vacfacts.info/anti-viral—liposomal-encapsulated-vitamin-c.html

————————————-

History Repeats Itself: Lessons Vaccinators Refuse to Learn, by Jennifer Craig, PhD
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/04/17/history-repeats-itself-lessons-the-vaccinationists-refuse-to-learn-by-jennifer-craig-phd/

Another below is another example of a failed effort with polio vaccine. It does little good to claim to have eliminated a certain number of previously present cases of polio, while at the same time causing massive cases of polio vaccine derived paralysis. 47,500 new cases. Yet they claim this is NECESSARY, to eradicate polio. They refuse to admit any failure, it seems to me?

Indian J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr-Jun;9(2):114-7.

Polio programme: let us declare victory and move on.

Vashisht N, Puliyel J.

Source:Department of Paediatrics, St Stephens Hospital, Delhi 110054, India.

Abstract

It was hoped that following polio eradication, immunisation could be stopped. However the synthesis of polio virus in 2002, made eradication impossible. It is argued that getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical. Furthermore, while India has been polio-free for a year, there has been a huge increase in non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP). In 2011, there were an extra 47,500 new cases of NPAFP. Clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly, the incidence of NPAFP was directly proportional to doses of oral polio received. Though this data was collected within the polio surveillance system, it was not investigated. The principle of primum-non-nocere was violated. The authors suggest that the huge bill of US$ 8 billion spent on the programme, is a small sum to pay if the world learns to be wary of such vertical programmes in the future.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22591873

VIDS – Vaccine Induced Diseases
http://www.vaccinesuncensored.org/vids.php

51 035 cases of AFP appear in this document (p 578) for India in 2011, and the in 2011. The figure of 86 638 cases of AFP was listed as globally.

http://www.who.int/wer/wer8650.pdf

VRM: The Re-emergence of Polio in The Third World (compliments of the World Health Organization & Bill Gates)
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=10091

VRM: Weaponized Polio & The African Green Monkey Conundrum
http://vaccineresistancemovement.org/?p=10727

Why I choose not to Vaccinate my child
by: Amy Goalen Whittam
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1Y2hS7WxS2gU4yXCjuYx84AY60tQc2rGXnTPPWqogOfk

What Is Coming Through That Needle? The Problem of Pathogenic Vaccine Contamination

Benjamin McRearden

http://www.scribd.com/doc/42722540/Vaccine-Contamination-Mcrearden

Mutant Polio Virus Spreads in Nigeria

Experts have long believed epidemics unleashed by a vaccine’s mutated virus wouldn’t last since the vaccine only contains a weakened virus strain – but that assumption is coming under pressure. Some experts now say that once viruses from vaccines start circulating they can become just as dangerous as wild viruses.

“The only difference is that this virus was originally in a vaccine vial,” said Olen Kew, a virologist at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The oral polio vaccine used in Nigeria and elsewhere contains a mild version of the live virus. Children who have been vaccinated pass the virus into the water supply through urine or feces. Other children who then play in or drink that water pick up the vaccine’s virus, which gives them some protection against polio.

But in rare instances, as the virus passes through unimmunized children, it can mutate into a strain dangerous enough to ignite new outbreaks, particularly if immunization rates in the rest of the population are low.

Kew said genetic analysis proves mutated viruses from the vaccine have caused at least seven separate outbreaks in Nigeria.

Though Nigeria’s coverage rates have improved, up to 15 percent of children in the north still haven’t been vaccinated against polio. To eradicate the disease, officials need to reach about 95 percent of the population.

Nigeria’s vaccine-linked outbreak underlines the need to stop using the oral polio vaccine as soon as possible, since it can create the very epidemics it was designed to stop, experts say. WHO is researching other vaccines that might work better, but none is on the horizon.

Until a better vaccine is ready, WHO and U.S. CDC officials say the oral vaccine is the best available tool to eradicate polio and that when inoculation rates are nearly 100 percent it works fine.

“Nigeria is almost a case study in what happens when you don’t follow the recommendations,” Kew said.

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-204_162-5242168.html

Mutated Polio From Vaccine Is Spreading in Africa

A mutation from a live polio vaccine is stalking Nigeria. In a strange twist of logic, experts are claiming that it mutated as it passed through non-immunized children.

The claim is that children given the live attenuated oral vaccine are properly immunized, but the live virus passes through them and enters local water supplies through their urine or feces. Then, children who have not been immunized pick up the supposedly safe virus by drinking or playing in the water. The weakened virus mutates in them, becoming a new virulent strain.

Why the virus would choose to mutate in non-vaccinated, rather than vaccinated, children is unexplained. Even odder is why the weakened virus would pass through the vaccinated children. If the purpose of a live attenuated vaccination is to force the body to develop antibodies to the virus, then why would live viruses be excreted? Shouldn’t they be killed by the newly-developed antibodies?

Are we being lied to?

This sounds much like the argument that blames nonvaccinated people for disease in those who’ve submitted to innoculations. If the vaccines are effective, then why would the vaccinated be at risk from the unvaccinated?

Are we being lied to?

http://www.gaia-health.com/articles51/000078-Polio-Caused-By-Vaccine.shtml

Nigeria Sees Polio Outbreak from Mutated Vaccine Virus
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/health/july-dec09/polio_08-24.html

Polio in Nigeria Traced to Mutating Vaccine
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/world/africa/11polio.html?_r=0

Mutated virus confirms polio vaccine fears. New Delhi
http://www.telegraphindia.com/1101024/jsp/nation/story_13094132.jsp

Vaccine. 1994 May;12(6):503-7.

Point mutations involved in the attenuation/neurovirulence alternation in type 1 and 2 oral polio vaccine strains detected by site-specific polymerase chain reaction.

We screened for this mutation in five type 1 and nine type 2 polio vaccine-derived strains isolated from vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) cases and in 16 such strains isolated from healthy vaccinees. All 14 strains isolated from VAPP presented the reversion. Of the eight pairs of type 1 isolates from healthy vaccinees, four presented the reversion 3 days after vaccine administration and all but one at 7 days postvaccination. These results support the involvement of the 5′ non-coding specific nucleotide sites in the reversion to neurovirulence of attenuated polio vaccine strains upon multiplication in the human gut

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8036823

Look at the unbelievable statements in the next set of information. So ask, WHY are they using a live and shedding viral vaccine, in these contaminated areas, at all?

Oral Polio Vaccine Circulation and Mutation after Mexican National Immunization Weeks

Conclusion: OPV, primarily serotype 2, was detected in sewage as late as 7 months after an NIW in a Mexican community primarily vaccinated with IPV, but was not detected at 8 months, suggesting that OPV circulation may have ceased.  VAPP mutants were predominantly detected.  This data suggests that in communities with high vaccination rates, one or two years of IPV administration after OPV cessation could be sufficient to prevent outbreaks of paralytic poliomyelitis from vaccine-derived strains.

https://idsa.confex.com/idsa/2011/webprogram/Paper30468.html

Polio vaccine suspected as cause of fatal mutant form of encephalitis

The polio vaccine isn’t protecting children – and, worse, it appears to be causing a new and sometimes fatal form of the disease.

Concerns about the vaccine have arisen following a high number of deaths and hospital admissions from encephalitis and polio in the Uttar Pradesh region of India – where there has been an intensive vaccination programme.

Around 400 children have died, and a further 2,300 admitted to hospital, following an outbreak of a new form of viral encephalitis, and doctors admit they do not know its cause.

http://www.wddty.com/polio-vaccine-suspected-as-cause-of-fatal-mutant-form-of-encephalitis.html

Unvaccinated Blamed for Mutated Polio, (AGAIN ALWAYS FALSELY THE UNVACCINATED ARE BLAMED FOR ANYTHING THAT HAPPENS)

Mutant polio vaccine regains virulence

Excerpts:

But the latest study raises the frightening possibility that the vaccine strain can also regain the ability to spread between people more easily than thought. “It demonstrates clearly that the vaccine virus can spread from person to person,” says Olen Kew from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia.

The outbreak was exacerbated by the fact that Haiti had relaxed its polio vaccination program more than five years earlier. “It’s a warning that you need to have good coverage to prevent vaccines from running away like this,” Kew says.

Total eradication

The study also shows how difficult it will be eliminate polio entirely. For this to be achieved, natural polio would first have to be wiped out through stringent use of the oral polio vaccine. Then all countries could simultaneously stop vaccinating or switch to a different vaccine – injectable, dead polio virus.

This method does not confer as much immunity as the oral vaccine, but it cannot revert to a disease-causing form. This vaccine is already used in the US and much of Europe.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2047-mutant-polio-vaccine-regains-virulence.html

This again points to the claim that they think they need to get 100% vaccine coverage in ever country with existing polio, and only then it may be possible to stop polio, but yet they know they will have the mutations still going on and the result of that is in their minds quite obviously only necessary collateral damage, so to speak. So, as long as they can keep blaming it all on the unvaccinated, which is not exactly proven; it is an assumption. And as long as they keep playing Russian Roulette with the vaccine virus; in the hopes that it does not continue to mutate to a point of becoming a super virus world wide. But in the end, the with the known odds that have been and in the resulting outcomes; clearly it all shows this plan to be not only failing and dangerous; but even currently, is likely causing more harm than good; and will continue to.

J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Sep;33(9):2485-8.

Detection of measles virus RNA in urine specimens from vaccine recipients.

Rota PA, Khan AS, Durigon E, Yuran T, Villamarzo YS, Bellini WJ.

Source: Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.

Abstract

Analysis of urine specimens by using reverse transcriptase-PCR was evaluated as a rapid assay to identify individuals infected with measles virus. For the study, daily urine samples were obtained from either 15-month-old children or young adults following measles immunization. Overall, measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children during the 2-week sampling period. In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after vaccination. Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination. This assay will enable continued studies of the shedding and transmission of measles virus and, it is hoped, will provide a rapid means to identify measles infection, especially in mild or asymptomatic cases.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7494055

You see in the next below link that it ALL depends on who has done the study, as for if they find the evidence of shedding due to a/or the vaccine. Here we have the Journal of Infectious diseases that is closely aligned with pharma and Offit’s CHOP. And they of course find predicable no shedding. Can you imagine the upset if they had, and presented to the CDC with that? Clearly, is not happening.

J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189 Suppl 1:S165-70.

Lack of evidence of measles virus shedding in people with inapparent measles virus infections.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15106106

And here, and again pharma connected

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22983013

So, the pro vaccine side again claims to what? Well if there are no studies to prove that the vaccines cause shedding, then it simply doesn’t happen. Just like in regard to the vaccine aluminum adjuvants; if no studies have ever been done, then we can proclaim that there is no scientific proof of the harm, thus there is no said harm being done.

J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Mar;46(3):1101-3. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

Detection of RNA of mumps virus during an outbreak in a population with a high level of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine coverage.

Bitsko RH, Cortese MM, Dayan GH, Rota PA, Lowe L, Iversen SC, Bellini WJ.

Source:Epidemic Intelligence Service, Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

Abstract

The duration of mumps virus RNA detection was studied during a mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated university population. Seven of the eight reverse transcription-PCR-positive specimens were collected during the first 3 days of parotitis, suggesting that viral shedding is minimal after the first 3 days of symptoms.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184850

However, in three days, you could infect 100’s of people.

General Index: But as you can see, very few actual studies on vaccine shedding have been done.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=shedding%20of%20measles%20vaccine%20mealses

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez

Secondary Transmission: The short and sweet about live virus vaccine shedding.(A short list of the evidence of shedding in regard to each specific vaccine).

http://insidevaccines.com/wordpress/2008/02/24/secondary-transmission-%EF%BB%BFthe-short-and-sweet-about-live-virus-vaccine-shedding/

Measles Vaccine Found in Throat of Vaccinated Child
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11858860

Pediatr Dermatol. 2005 Mar-Apr;22(2):130-2.

Vaccine-associated “wild-type” measles.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15804301

Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1995 Jun;37(3):374-6.
Measles encephalomyelitis in a patient with a history of vaccination.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7645392

Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Oct;29(4):855-61.
Measles inclusion-body encephalitis caused by the vaccine strain of measles virus.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10589903

Pediatr Neurol. 1999 May;20(5):399-402.

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis with probable measles vaccine failure.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10371390

I would take my chances with natural infection and recovery, any day; over that of the use of a vaccine, or in this and the most common case, the MMR vaccine..

Picture

Free Speech Rights Under Attack in Australia

Free Speech Rights Under Attack in Australia

March 29, 2013 by admin in Featured, Politics, Vaccines with 0 Comments

Whatever you believe about vaccination, surely those who disagree with forced inoculations and medical treatment have the right to their views and to choose whether they’ll be subjected to medical treatments of any sort, including vaccination. But the right is under siege in Australia, as the Australian Vaccination Network struggles against obvious attempts to shut them down.

Australian Flag with Fist-Held Syringe Superimposed

Australian Flag (by erjkprunczýk) with Fist-Held Syringe Superimposed

by Heidi Stevenson

The Australian Vaccination Network (AVN) has actively advocated for vaccination choice and provided information about vaccine risks for many years. Suddenly, the New South Wales Department of Fair Trading (DFT) has decided that their name is misleading and demanded that they change it. They have refused to state how it’s misleading and provided no advice about what change is required. They simply demand that the name be changed.

This may seem like a minor problem, but when an organization has existed for a long time, has a website based on their name, and trades under that name, being forced to change it is onerous. Nonetheless, AVN has done its best trying to cooperate, but they haven’t even been informed of how their name is supposed to be misleading! They have sent polite letters stating that they want to cooperate and asking the DFT to provide guidance. You can see three of them by clicking on these links: 27 December 201318 February 2013, and 6 March 2013.

They’ve gotten no response to their requests. So AVN requested a stay of the order, which is normally a fairly routine procedure. But their response was to declare that they must change their name immediately because it’s an emergency! AVN has existed since 1994—nearly 20 years—and it’s suddenly an emergency that they change their name?

After all, their actions against AVN clearly demonstrate that the Department of Fair Trading is most assuredly not living up to its name. It is, in fact, doing the oppositve—attempting to shut down a legitimate organization that is precisely what it claims, an organization that is a network of people in Australia on the subject of vaccination.

Obviously, there’s more to this than the desire to see their name changed. This is nothing less than part of an ongoing program designed to destroy the AVN. What reason could there be, other than to silence their voice?

So, AVN’s president, Greg Beattie, attended a hearing on 20 March 2013 regarding their request for a stay. Note that this now has moved into a legal matter requiring attorneys and their costs. Clearly, there’s no reason for doing this. After all, the AVN indicated willingness to cooperate, but they don’t know what needs to be done to satisfy the DFT—and the DFT has refused to advise them.

For this hearing, the DFT paid a group of people as expert witnesses. Why would they need expert witnesses for a simple extension hearing? And how much was paid to them? In any case, their expertise—whatever it is—seems not to have come into play, or if it did, it wasn’t clarified to AVN. Perhaps they should, instead, look inward and consider changing their name. I’ll even help them out: The Department of Speech Suppression would be ever so much more accurate!

AVN’s barrister laid out the reasons for granting a stay to allow the AVN staff time to consult with the membership. The government’s solicitor didn’t respond to what was said, merely stated that the public’s interest requires that AVN change it’s name now! Why, though, wasn’t explained.

To save money, both Beattie and AVN’s barrister appeared by telephone, since they are not located in New South Wales. DFT’s solicitor, though, in a show of pettiness, complained that it was an imposition, and the Member—Australian term for a judge—went along with it. Therefore, AVN’s barrister must show up in person, which means that AVN must cover the cost of flights and expenses.

Lest you have any doubts about DFT’s attitude towards AVN, the night before the hearing, AVN’s barrister was contacted by DFT’s legal representative. He treated AVN”s barrister extremely rudely and called AVN “fucking wackos”. They don’t like having their actions pointed out to the public, so deny AVN’s right to post the fact of this abominable behavior.

Attack on the Right to an Independent Viewpoint

AVN is clearly under attack. It isn’t because of any actual crime. It’s simply because they’re espousing a viewpoint that runs counter to the government’s. What’s under attack is the right to free speech. The point that needs to be understood is that this is not about whether vaccinations are good or bad. It’s about whether an organization or individual has the right to espouse a point of view that’s different from the government’s.

As it now stands, the government is acting as an enforcer of corporate interests. Big Pharma and Big Medicine want to promote and sell vaccines. AVN, apparently, is making headway against their profit machine … so the government is attacking AVN in the pettiest manner possible. There can be little doubt that the goal is to shut them down, to quiet their voice.

This is not the first attack on AVN. As reported earlier, a vicious attack on Meryl Dorey, AVN’s founder, was launched. She was subjected to vile pornographic messages and threatened over and over by phone. A distributed denial of service attack was launched against their website. Yet, the police and agencies that are supposed to protect people from such treatment failed to respond.

Last year, on the basis of two complaints, the Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) launched an investigation of AVN. They ordered AVN to include a statement on their site that states:

the Australian Vaccination Network’s purpose is to provide information against vaccination in order to balance what it believes is the substantial amount of pro-vaccination information available elsewhere;
the information should not be read as medical advice and;
the decision about whether or not to vaccinate should be made in consultation with a health care provider.

Obviously, only the medical monopoly is granted the right to make statements about health issues. It matters not if they’re right or wrong, the general public is not supposed to question them.

The HCCC also stripped their right to fund raise. AVN fought back and that right was returned to them.

Current Status

The AVN has won an extension until June to consult with members, but have been forced to place a consumer warning notice on their website reading:

Consumer Warning: NSW Fair Trading has directed Australian Vaccination Network to change its name because it regards the name to be misleading. The Australian Vaccination Network is challenging this Direction and the challenge is currently before the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal.

AVN was quite happy to do so. It clearly indicates to anyone who isn’t completely blinded to the corporate-owned government that freedom of speech is no longer considered a right. You can see it posted proudly at the top of every page on their site.

If you can possibly help AVN, please do. It’s clear that they’re in a battle for their existence, and equally clear that they’re also fighting for our right to hear the other side of the vaccine debate. Surely it’s obvious that this is everyone’s cause. Whether you agree with AVN or disagree vehemently, surely it’s obvious that they have the right to express their point of view. If the suppression doesn’t stop here, where will it stop?

You can contact the New South Wales Department of Fair Trading and tell them that their function is not defined as suppression of speech. It’s to provide a fair ground for everyone to trade. The right to free speech belongs to us all, not only those who agree with the government.

The phone number is (02) 9228 5276.

As AVN has stated, “You can act now—or you can wait for the knock on your door telling you your right to say no to drug-based therapies and medical vaccination has been taken away for good. The choice is yours.”