Epistolary communication of councilor Dr. von Boenninghausen to Dr. Rummel
Allg. hom. zeit., vol. xxxix, page 98
I use a moment of quiet to communicate to you two observations, quite various in their character, one even being drawn from the department of chemistry, and yet both of them seem of use to our science on which account I do not object to their publication.
The first observation is respecting the enormous and fatal effects of the high potencies when the dynamization is much increased by excessive shaking with water.
I came to this knowledge in the following manner: In the second half of last winter there were an unusual number of cases of hydrophobia among the dogs, and even at present hardly a day passes without my services being called for to aid some person bitten. Homoeopathy and high potencies have proved their worth. I have used only two or three pellets of the 200th potency dissolved in water for a dose this year, but neither this nor the preceding years have I ever heard that any man or animal treated in this manner by me was seized with hydrophobia.
Nevertheless in the last eleven days I have had two deaths of dogs. The first case was that of a large fine bull-dog of Burgess Boening near Drensteinfurth, that had been bitten by a dog which proved to be mad. As usual I gave the owner, who valued the dog highly, a number of powders, Nos. 1, 3 and 5 Belladonna, 2 Hyoscyamus, 4 Stramonium, all of the 200th potency, to be given every three days in their proper order, one powder dissolved in water by shaking, which could best be effected in a small bottle. This man was too zealous in well-doing, as I afterwards found out, and shook up the powder every time most vigorously for five minutes and over, and than he gave it to the dog with boiled sweet milk which had been allowed to cool off. After each one of these powders the dog had looked very doleful for a whole day; after the last he would not eat any more, though still willing to drink water. On the third day after taking the fifth powder he died, but without showing the least sign of madness or hydrophobia.
About two weeks later I gave the same remedies, to be taken in the same manner, to a large mastiff on Heithorn’s Kolonet in the village of Hittrup, and as if by a providential decree, to impress the lesson taught by the former example, also in this case the shaking of the medicine in water was carried, to excess. In consequence the result was just the same. After the last powder the dog was taken very sick and as he was near dying on the second day they ended his pains with a bullet. Also this dog did not show any symptom of madness before his death. It is to be noted that I have given the same remedy in the same dose and the same manner to quite a number of animals of various kinds, horses, cows, hogs and little dogs, as also to some men who had been bitten, without producing any noticeable trouble; nor did hydrophobia appear with any one of them. But so far as I know and can find out by inquiry, in none of those cases had the potentizing been increased by an excess of shaking, as in the two cases given above.
Though we have here two facts, they stand as yet too isolated to derive certain conclusions therefrom, and I fully see that there are many ways of escaping from the deduction. Still these phenomena seem to me of sufficient importance to call attention to them and cause us to give attention to this matter. If others of my honored colleagues should have heard of similar cases, or can communicate other facts which show that my apprehensions as to the effect of too violent potentizing are baseless, I may well request them for the good of our science to communicate them.