If you ever want a high paying job other than homoeopathy, Id recommend marine electrician… everyone i contacted is booked out………..
That aside, case taking and why many cases fail.
simply put, it usually is because the wrong remedy is given.
Its not hard to fail. We all do it. In order to overcome a large percentage of failures, we have to examine ‘Why ‘ we fail, and usually, it comes down to a singular reason in the case taking. The bottom line is that we are picking the wrong symptoms, plain and simple.
So what is the key to picking the right symptoms?
During this period of lockdowns and distancing, its a wonderful time to study the Organon in a guided manner……..to REALLY understand what is required to treat a person.
Let me dispel a myth. This singular misunderstanding ruins so many cases that it needs to taught time and time again.
This holds good to such an extent, that the state of the disposition of the patient often chiefly determines the selection of the homoeopathic remedy, as being a decidedly characteristic symptom which can least of all remain concealed from the accurately observing physician.
The huge mistake here is not reading the Organon in context. Kent et al use this as the primary state of the patient to prescribe………….and it is incorrect. If you use this as prescribing criteria, you may be prescribing on the personality and not the disease.
Aphorism 210 to 230, is discussing…….
Of psoric origin are almost all those diseases that I have above termed one-sided, which appear to be more difficult to cure in consequence of this one-sidedness, all their other morbid symptoms disappearing, as it were, before the single, great, prominent symptom. Of this character are what are termed mental diseases. They do not, however, constitute a class of disease the condition of the disposition and mind is always altered;1 and in all cases of disease we are called on to cure the state of the patient’s disposition is to be particularly noted, along with the totality of the symptoms, if we would trace an accurate picture of the disease, in order to be able therefrom to treat it homoeopathically with success.
So contextually, looking here….
§ 6 Fifth Edition
The unprejudiced observer – well aware of the futility of transcendental speculations which can receive no confirmation from experience – be his powers of penetration ever so great, takes note of nothing in every individual disease, except the changes in the health of the body and of the mind (morbid phenomena, accidents, symptoms) which can be perceived externally by means of the senses; that is to say, he notices only the deviations from the former healthy state of the now diseased individual, which are felt by the patient himself, remarked by those around him and observed by the physician. All these perceptible signs represent the disease in its whole extent, that is, together they form the true and only conceivable portrait of the disease.1
No where does Hahnemann state that anything other than altered symptoms be taken into account….dont base the prescription on personality or desires unless altered and opposite to the norm, and of a marked observable nature….
This one shift in taking a case will raise your prescription success rate higher immediately………..